Marianne Ny, Julian Assange, and Abuse of Process.

Here is a copy and paste of a comment I posted in response to someone who thinks Assange is evading justice. I thought you all might like it.

@Carnivore:
He has good reason to believe he will get no fair trial in Sweden. Here is the proof..

http://www.chillingmesoftly.com/content/proof-marianne-ny-lied-swedish-c...

It is the Swedish prosecutor lying to get the arrest warrant. Now the British judge, Howard Riddle, is wanting to see evidence of a prima facie case because you cannot extradite on an EAW just for 'questioning'. He wants evidence, or a charge, and if she charges him she will have to show Assange the evidence. And there isn't any that wasn't throughly refuted by the two accusers' blogs, tweets and text messages..

Even had the Swedish prosecutor been truthful in her claim that she had been 'unable' to interview Assange, and lets face it he tried eight times to be questioned before he gave up - she still isn't entitled to demand his presence so the EAW is without foundation. Were she to charge him, it would be a different matter.

The Swedes are attempting to hold Assange long enough for the US to bail them out by torturing Manning into giving up Assange.

This is known as 'abuse of process' in Europe, and we have legal protections against it. Assange is using these legal protections, as is his right.

So, as there is no legal requiremennt for him to be in Sweden what do we have left? A rabid woman who lies on oath, with delusions of Feminism, demanding Assange takes time out of his *busy* day to be locked up incommunicado in her personal dungeon.

If thats the sort of thing that appeals to him he can find it on Craigslist. It is not necessary to go all the way to Sweden.